“Revolutions which are not controlled and held within reasonable limits,” Union General Nathaniel P. Banks warned in 1864, “produce counter-revolution.” But to date, the response to the rioting seems to contradict the record. For one, the Republican Party and the majority of powerful ‘good guys’ are conspicuously silent. What we are seeing, according to Jewish conservative Wayne Allyn Root, is consistent with 1930’s Germany, and bear striking similarities to Kristallnacht (‘Night of the Broken Glass’), where windows were shattered, stores looted and burned; people in blackshirts roaming the streets demanding people kneel at their feet; censorship, book burning, snitching by neighbors and co-workers; egregious media propaganda and manipulation of current events; and the police and ‘good people’ doing nothing to help. Like the plight of German Jews under the Third Reich, “white America” is regularly told that because we are genetically linked to past slaveholders who were mostly white, we are equally guilty of slavery and Jim Crow as our ancestors ― or for that matter, the alleged systemic police brutality since all cops, at their core, are ‘white’. Currently as I write this, many large urban areas are dismantling their police departments.
Libertarians may in fact share the amorality of socialists. Yet in the postwar period when “the best social conditions have been achieved in the West,” Solzhenitsyn wistfully observed “there still (was) criminality and there even is considerably more of it than in the pauper and lawless Soviet society” — or for that matter, Nazi Germany and Communist China. Over the 30 years since the fall of communism, a new political conflict featuring a less ideologically-moored, more identitarian and relativist ‘left-wing/right-wing’ dialogue emerged, pitting Globalism on the left (featuring neoconservatism, libertarianism, and ‘green’ socialism) versus the new Nationalism on the right (Reagan-Thatcherite conservatism and some far left-wing groups). Liberal democracy was weaponized by the European Union and the United Nations to organize a new world order in which George H.W. Bush vowed would replace ‘the law of the jungle’ through mass efforts to democratize the world under Western liberal values and multilateral free trade treaties. Ancient cultures fomented over several centuries have, since 1989, been dying more quickly than under communism and fascism with every voluntary swipe of a credit card driving consumer confidence, the outsourcing of industry, ‘brain drain’ and wars promoting Rudyard Kipling’s points in The White Man’s Burden by ‘democratizing’ poor oriental nations and exploiting the inevitable humanitarian crises they bring through open borders. This fusion of ‘green’ socialism with libertarianism has produced the third (and most successful) wave attempting to construct a new Tower of Babel at the United Nations.
Because we are trapped within our cultural perspectives and therefore can only express our individual interpretations, we’re coerced into acknowledging the existence of many truths (‘radical acceptance of multiculturalism‘) by different people (the very definition of ‘openmindedness’) of a broader community over our own primacy through some form of social distancing. This effectively relieves each student of the need to be right while demanding they only appear interesting, and therefore conditioning them to embrace participation trophies in little league baseball or soccer. A gradual pivot towards ‘pass/fail’ grading scales, free college education, and elimination of college entrance exams for the purpose of increasing enrollment figures fits neatly into the objectives of education bureaucrats, mental health professionals, social workers, and social scientists. If they are fulfilled, they will have convinced each student from an early age to believe they are happy simply “because the government will tell them that they are so” ― and all this of course because they were conditioned to believe that ‘snow is black’, not white.
Not surprising, cultural appropriation’s critics cite grievances that acculturation, assimilation, or equal cultural exchange are forms of colonialism. Today in America, this manifests from immigration and a collective minority enclave throughout the social sciences (sociology, cultural anthropology, gender studies, women’s studies, etc.) intent on “running a majority of an organization through a well-organized minority” — a point comparable to Ronald Reagan’s testimony in 1947 before Congress on Soviet infiltration of Hollywood studios and the Screen Actors Guild.
For the globalist agenda in the wake of the Cold War, the ‘truth’ doesn’t matter. Whether ‘climate change’ is a lie or the West has run its course is not a matter of ‘truth’: we are told that ‘truth’, like beauty, lies in the eyes of the beholder. Moreover, our frenetic culture disposes us to be skeptical of almost everything. We now relate better to literary characters who’ve suffered through life, who possess good and bad sides and are amoral than characters seen as overly righteous. The definition of the ‘antihero’ differs from the ‘tragic hero’, who evokes “a sense of pity and fear in the audience… a man of misfortune that comes to him through error(s) of judgment.” For all his faults, McCarthy was a war hero who joined the U.S. Marine Corp in 1942 to serve his country in World War II; and in terms of motive, he was guilty of a ‘crime of passion’: his love of country drove him to unscrupulous means to bring down the enemy within. Now, with respect to the Chinese Communist Party’s infiltration of American institutions throughout our government, higher education, ‘fake news’ and ‘woke capitalism’, the case is strong enough to consider rehabilitating Sen. McCarthy as ‘a tragic hero’: to love his motives, but reject his means.
One key platform within the Postmodern narrative is designed to deconstruct Western institutions along racial lines. The Arab Spring (2011-13) exploited the ancient Christian-Muslim rivalry in the Europe and Canada through mass immigration. This is designed to overload the welfare system, and to use the narrative revised to ‘right a wrong’ more than a century following the collapse of the Ottoman Empire. In the United States, decades of communist revolutions which transformed Latin America into a battlefront in the Cold War are being exploited through caravans and the Democratic Party’s complicity in ethnic cleansing within the Middle East and south of our border.
The idea by the Globalist Left to promote foreign nationalism is to underpin an internal dialogue vexing anyone daring to oppose the ruling establishment. Ironically, the Democrats’ ideal anti-Western society would reflect its favorite region of Europe, Scandinavia, closely connected to the Laws of Jante, of which ten laws immediately apply.
Enter in 2019 the Intellectual Dark Web (or, IDW) ―an ideologically unmoored ensemble of thinkers and individuals from all backgrounds who, while willing to disagree (and at times, do so fiercely), they nevertheless embrace the principle of civil conversation and disengagement. This list of leading figures of the IDW varies in gender, sexual orientation, race, and political affiliation, and do not form alliances based on their identities or tribal affiliation. As the organization’s website concludes on its front page, while most figures “have been more-or-less roasted by the campfire by their ‘tribe’ and the online public at large,” they nevertheless “have been able to find a wide audience that resonates with what they have to say” ―and in other words, form ‘new tribes’ in the spirit of democracy (but not at the ballot box) because “they are willing to voice what others think, but are too unwilling to say publicly.” As a result, they don’t pretend to have the answers to life’s questions (no one but God has those), but they are willing to offer suggestions for anyone willing to consider them.
Yet what’s so astonishing in the wake of this rising ‘moral perfectionism’ is how little the Left seem to understand that Charles Darwin and his theory of evolution provided the doctrine behind white supremacy, the rise of Adolf Hitler and the Holocaust; as well as a key component, alongside Nietszche and Ivan Pavlov’s study of classical conditioning for dogs, for Stalin’s rule by terror and conquest in the Soviet Union.
“The myth of the 60s was created before the decade was out. But what we have lived with ever since is a mirage, a mass hallucination, a fantasy. ‘Why I Hate the Sixties’ examines the truth behind the myth. It suggests that we were living on borrowed time – we partied as Britain lost an empire and slid into unchecked industrial decline. Archive footage and contributors of all political stripes build the case against the decade.”
Once upon a time (or, about five or so years ago), two sides could debate civilly, providing information that they themselves found to be credible as to their position, even if the other party did not find what was claimed to be entirely credible. But today in the age of ‘safe spaces’, ‘triggered microaggressions’ and…
Fast-forward to the 21st Century, nearly 30 years after the fall of the Soviet Union and international communism, and America finds herself facing an existential threat from both within and throughout. She is more godless today than any time in her history: her people, corrupt, mouthing ’empty, boastful words’, whose elected leaders, “by appealing to the lustful desires of the flesh,” seeking their 30 pieces of silver as “they entice people who are just escaping from those who live in error” granted through the false doctrine of worldly freedom, “while they themselves are slaves of depravity—for ‘people are slaves to whatever has mastered them.’” Over time, America tolerated too much, expected too little, and in the name of ‘civil rights’ and declarations of the rights of man and the citizen, turned away from its Judeo-Christian by becoming first lukewarm and lastly, divided between God’s sheep and wolves seeking to devour them. As science gradually erodes the role of the church in American culture, what can be said of godless scientists has never rang truer: “A dog returns to its vomit,” while “A sow that is washed returns to her wallowing in the mud.” (2 Peter 2:22)
One line could sufficiently describe the decline and fall of America and Western civilization by quoting the influential famed occultist/Satanist Aleister Crowley (1875-1947), who wrote in Book of the Law “Do What Thou Wilt Shall Be The Whole Of The Law!” But it goes much deeper to expand upon Friedrich Nietzsche’s declaration that “God is dead” in Thus Spake Zarathustra (1883), and how such demagogues have successfully achieved most of their agenda.
All the laws in the world, all the constitutions that have ever existed, will not save a nation that has permitted itself to become culturally and socially demoralized and destabilized to the point of crisis; constitutions have to be written on hearts, not just paper.