How does social media afflict society, both holistically as well as culturally, in public education as well as national politics? Well, in the last 15 years beginning with MySpace, social media has become an indispensable tool in our lives that we rarely pay attention to how much time we’re spending on sites Twitter ― well, unless you are Donald Trump, who no one can miss his tweeting stupid things. How ironic then that an oxymoron promoting social distancing under the hashtag #togetherapart illustrates how a generation ago, technology replaced interpersonal relationships with online dating and pornography, local communities and comradery with chat rooms and social media, and ultimately ones American identity through the World Wide Web.
America, like the rest of the West, has finally discovered it’s lost its soul, and is burning because of it. As America goes, so goes the West. And the West, in particular the United Nations, has run out of bullets to impose multiculturalism within from abroad, for the people are rebelling. Like the Constitution, the cold application of Western philosophy and the word of the law are defenseless against the discriminating tastes of foreign cultures if your own civilization has renounced God. If you don’t know where you want to go, the Cheshire Cat informed Alice in Wonderland, “than it doesn’t matter which way you go.” And if Western humanism cannot conquer the ancient cultures which never lost their identities, how can it defend Western civilization given it is politically incorrect to define?
Saving America from encroaching socialism and the destructive forces of laissez-faire capitalism will require a ‘new’ approach to governing that on one hand, defends the Constitution through a ‘revised’ conservatism rejecting “old gods such as Locke and Jefferson… Barry Goldwater and Paul Ryan,” according to F.H. Buckley, while rediscovering “thinkers like John Dickinson, Robert Taft, even Margaret Chase Smith” through political subsidiarity similar to the governments of Poland and Hungary. Such a system, according to the late Pope John Paul II, must reject the “social assistance state” in his 1991 encyclical Centesimus Annus, which contradicts the principle of subsidiarity by intervening directly and depriving society of its responsibility, leading “to a loss of human energies and an inordinate increase of public agencies which are dominated more by bureaucratic ways of thinking than by concern for serving their clients and which are accompanied by an enormous increase in spending.”
Libertarians may in fact share the amorality of socialists. Yet in the postwar period when “the best social conditions have been achieved in the West,” Solzhenitsyn wistfully observed “there still (was) criminality and there even is considerably more of it than in the pauper and lawless Soviet society” — or for that matter, Nazi Germany and Communist China. Over the 30 years since the fall of communism, a new political conflict featuring a less ideologically-moored, more identitarian and relativist ‘left-wing/right-wing’ dialogue emerged, pitting Globalism on the left (featuring neoconservatism, libertarianism, and ‘green’ socialism) versus the new Nationalism on the right (Reagan-Thatcherite conservatism and some far left-wing groups). Liberal democracy was weaponized by the European Union and the United Nations to organize a new world order in which George H.W. Bush vowed would replace ‘the law of the jungle’ through mass efforts to democratize the world under Western liberal values and multilateral free trade treaties. Ancient cultures fomented over several centuries have, since 1989, been dying more quickly than under communism and fascism with every voluntary swipe of a credit card driving consumer confidence, the outsourcing of industry, ‘brain drain’ and wars promoting Rudyard Kipling’s points in The White Man’s Burden by ‘democratizing’ poor oriental nations and exploiting the inevitable humanitarian crises they bring through open borders. This fusion of ‘green’ socialism with libertarianism has produced the third (and most successful) wave attempting to construct a new Tower of Babel at the United Nations.
For the globalist agenda in the wake of the Cold War, the ‘truth’ doesn’t matter. Whether ‘climate change’ is a lie or the West has run its course is not a matter of ‘truth’: we are told that ‘truth’, like beauty, lies in the eyes of the beholder. Moreover, our frenetic culture disposes us to be skeptical of almost everything. We now relate better to literary characters who’ve suffered through life, who possess good and bad sides and are amoral than characters seen as overly righteous. The definition of the ‘antihero’ differs from the ‘tragic hero’, who evokes “a sense of pity and fear in the audience… a man of misfortune that comes to him through error(s) of judgment.” For all his faults, McCarthy was a war hero who joined the U.S. Marine Corp in 1942 to serve his country in World War II; and in terms of motive, he was guilty of a ‘crime of passion’: his love of country drove him to unscrupulous means to bring down the enemy within. Now, with respect to the Chinese Communist Party’s infiltration of American institutions throughout our government, higher education, ‘fake news’ and ‘woke capitalism’, the case is strong enough to consider rehabilitating Sen. McCarthy as ‘a tragic hero’: to love his motives, but reject his means.
One key platform within the Postmodern narrative is designed to deconstruct Western institutions along racial lines. The Arab Spring (2011-13) exploited the ancient Christian-Muslim rivalry in the Europe and Canada through mass immigration. This is designed to overload the welfare system, and to use the narrative revised to ‘right a wrong’ more than a century following the collapse of the Ottoman Empire. In the United States, decades of communist revolutions which transformed Latin America into a battlefront in the Cold War are being exploited through caravans and the Democratic Party’s complicity in ethnic cleansing within the Middle East and south of our border.
The idea by the Globalist Left to promote foreign nationalism is to underpin an internal dialogue vexing anyone daring to oppose the ruling establishment. Ironically, the Democrats’ ideal anti-Western society would reflect its favorite region of Europe, Scandinavia, closely connected to the Laws of Jante, of which ten laws immediately apply.
After 243 years, America has become a product of history separate from its founding principles inscribed within its Constitution — principles promoting ancient Judeo-Christian values which embody Western philosophy and English legalism. […]
Now in the third decade of the 21st century, the international liberal order (that is, liberal democracies) faces an existential crisis — a crisis of its own making. Its guiltiest parties are not the politicians, but rather the gullible voters who, for generations, elected individuals with utopian visions which appealed to their fantasies driven by passions not grounded in reality. For example, can we say that America still reflects its foundation? Or has that run its course and become a product of history? By knowing history better, we may project our likely future as a nation. As Winston Churchill, a noted historian in his own right, observed, “The farther backward you can look, the farther forward you are likely to see.” The Globalist Left today, in unison with the European Union, is reconstructing America to resemble qualities utterly anathema to her history.
“For the Intermarium to successfully form, Poland — which borders both Germany and Russia — must lead the Visegrad Group and Three Seas Initiative to undermine and isolate both the dying German-dominated European Union and the renewed ambitions of the economically-ailing Russian bear to its east. While the resurrection of a modern Kalmar Union in Scandinavia following the EU’s collapse is less likely due to the small populations collectively in Denmark, Sweden and Norway, its potential partnership with Poland ― with backing from the U.S. ― stands not only to be the coronation of a major geopolitical actor whose design is to drive a hostile wedge up the gut through the continent’s heartland, but as the principal intercessor between the imperial ambitions of Russian Eurasianism and a United States of Europe. Here, the idea is a gambit to greatly decrease the probability of another catastrophic continental war on one hand; and on the other, secure Western Civilization in the wake of the open hijra by migrants who, according to ISIS, will someday by design destabilize and Islamify Europe.”
Fast-forward to the 21st Century, nearly 30 years after the fall of the Soviet Union and international communism, and America finds herself facing an existential threat from both within and throughout. She is more godless today than any time in her history: her people, corrupt, mouthing ’empty, boastful words’, whose elected leaders, “by appealing to the lustful desires of the flesh,” seeking their 30 pieces of silver as “they entice people who are just escaping from those who live in error” granted through the false doctrine of worldly freedom, “while they themselves are slaves of depravity—for ‘people are slaves to whatever has mastered them.’” Over time, America tolerated too much, expected too little, and in the name of ‘civil rights’ and declarations of the rights of man and the citizen, turned away from its Judeo-Christian by becoming first lukewarm and lastly, divided between God’s sheep and wolves seeking to devour them. As science gradually erodes the role of the church in American culture, what can be said of godless scientists has never rang truer: “A dog returns to its vomit,” while “A sow that is washed returns to her wallowing in the mud.” (2 Peter 2:22)
Markus Willinger, a grad student of history and political science from Schärding, Austria at the University of Stuttgart, published a manifesto in 2013 entitled Generation Identity: A Declaration of War Against the ’68ers. The term ‘68ers’ refers to the postmodern philosopher Jacques Derrida’s belief that the year 1968 was the phase of transitioning the counterculture movement into…
Because of this slight difference between rebellious nature to destroy Christian morality under ‘the Hitler faith’ (the Jewish Jesus Christ), and the amoral, godless dogma driving the utilitarian nature of Communism, the matter that mass murder and state terrorism was not a matter for debate. The reason, the largely irrelevant position over who should die between the racially unfit or those classes (bourgeoisie) failing to justify their existence was, not if or why, given they were one-and-the-same demographics. Because of this, the difference between history’s two most genocidal ideologies, in the words of Joseph Goebbels, are slight.
As Joseph Stalin once noted, “Education is a weapon whose effects depend on who holds it in his hands and at whom it is aimed.” The politically correct end likewise for Democrats and the globalist elites is to reconstruct a brave new world where “all will believe themselves happy, because the government will tell them that they are so,” be it through “war without bloodshed” or “politics with bloodshed”. Other prominent leftists like Russell and Margaret Sanger rejected traditional Judeo-Christian checks on human sexuality stunting the spread of scientism and secular humanism that reinforce Aryan supremacy as with National Socialism, or though those who otherwise fell under the Marxist-Leninist umbrella of “Scientific racism… an equal opportunity discriminator.” After all, anyone alive with a “defective gene pool” or resistant to ‘correct political views’ can fall prey to those profiting off ‘blood money’. After all, Planned Parenthood — as “self-consciously organized” by its founder, Sanger — was designed “in part, to promote and enforce White Supremacy” by packaging feminism as the great liberator for women oppressed by all “Marriage laws… a continuous sexual slavery and a compulsory motherhood… dictated and dominated by the Church always and ever upon the unquestionable grounds of the wisdom of the Bible”. Such a ‘somewhat unpleasant’ slippery slope acknowledged by Russell would never apply to racial and political “thoroughbreds” like Hitler, Russell and Sanger tabbed to preside over a “Population Congress” under the United Nations — for they, as “Really high minded people are indifferent to happiness, especially other people’s.” Targeted specifically would be ‘True Christianity’ — what Jean-Jacques Rousseau defined to be the Christianity of the Gospels — and Judaism, in light of the return of the Jews to the Holy Land of Israel. And the scientists perfecting ‘technique’ to attack both, according to Russell, “will be rigidly confined to the governing class.” Without such secrecy reinforcing this massive foundation of ignorance necessary for driving the left-wing globalist elite, how else could billions be brainwashed “produce the sort of character and the sort of beliefs that the authorities consider desirable”? It is here where history, coupled with resurrecting the organic and true nature behind the development of Anglo-American semantics through lexicology that could launch a third Great Awakening of the nation’s Judeo-Christian principles in today’s godless postmodern America.