The War for America’s Sovereignty Will Drive The New Seventh Party System

After 243 years, America has become a product of history separate from its founding principles inscribed within its Constitution — principles promoting ancient Judeo-Christian values which embody Western philosophy and English legalism. […]

Now in the third decade of the 21st century, the international liberal order (that is, liberal democracies) faces an existential crisis — a crisis of its own making. Its guiltiest parties are not the politicians, but rather the gullible voters who, for generations, elected individuals with utopian visions which appealed to their fantasies driven by passions not grounded in reality. For example, can we say that America still reflects its foundation? Or has that run its course and become a product of history? By knowing history better, we may project our likely future as a nation. As Winston Churchill, a noted historian in his own right, observed, “The farther backward you can look, the farther forward you are likely to see.” The Globalist Left today, in unison with the European Union, is reconstructing America to resemble qualities utterly anathema to her history.

In 1989, Communism Fell. In 2019, It Returned Through Green Politics.

Each autumn, the world revels in the celebrations of Halloween and for some denominations of Christianity the next day, All Saint’s Day, which counteracts its All Hallow’s Eve. The following week, Britons remember, remember the Fifth of November and the failed gunpowder plot of revolutionary anarchist, Guy Fawkes, in 1606 geared to assassinate the Stuart monarch King James I. Some three to four weeks later depending on the year, America gives thanks for nearly 400 years of Anglo-American settlement at Plymouth, Massachusetts, understanding the blessings of their lives in a free land where just years prior to November 1621, the English separatists history would declare as the American pilgrims fled and were displaced due to their non-conformity to the Church of England’s sovereignty. Yet so few recall how just 26 years ago, a simple clip of an iron barb wire fence along the Hungarian frontiers bordering Austria and West Germany ignited an unprecedented zeitgeist of mammoth geopolitical proportions. It was as the epic lyrics of Billy Joel declared. “We didn’t start the fire.” The yearning for human freedom and liberty “was always burning.”

Indeed, history is full of coincidences, and like playing Jenga, removing one block can cause the entire tower to collapse. While the Polish people celebrated the nation’s first free election on June 4 1989, the Chinese people were carrying out the dead bodies of the protestors and fellow comrades who may have been innocent bystanders felled by the Chinese People’s Liberation Party from Beijing’s Tiananmen Square. Thus, June 4 was a pivotal point in history in separate hemispheres, with different meanings: while it symbolized the start of a new and democratic future in Poland, it was the fateful end of the short-lived democratic movement in China.

The Intermarium Gambit: Eastern Europe’s Path To Divide and Checkmate the Crumbling Eurasian Heartland

“For the Intermarium to successfully form, Poland — which borders both Germany and Russia — must lead the Visegrad Group and Three Seas Initiative to undermine and isolate both the dying German-dominated European Union and the renewed ambitions of the economically-ailing Russian bear to its east. While the resurrection of a modern Kalmar Union in Scandinavia following the EU’s collapse is less likely due to the small populations collectively in Denmark, Sweden and Norway, its potential partnership with Poland ― with backing from the U.S. ― stands not only to be the coronation of a major geopolitical actor whose design is to drive a hostile wedge up the gut through the continent’s heartland, but as the principal intercessor between the imperial ambitions of Russian Eurasianism and a United States of Europe. Here, the idea is a gambit to greatly decrease the probability of another catastrophic continental war on one hand; and on the other, secure Western Civilization in the wake of the open hijra by migrants who, according to ISIS, will someday by design destabilize and Islamify Europe.”

[WATCH] “Why I Hate The Sixties” | BBC Documentary (Plus Commentary)

“The myth of the 60s was created before the decade was out. But what we have lived with ever since is a mirage, a mass hallucination, a fantasy. ‘Why I Hate the Sixties’ examines the truth behind the myth. It suggests that we were living on borrowed time – we partied as Britain lost an empire and slid into unchecked industrial decline. Archive footage and contributors of all political stripes build the case against the decade.”

—Peter Hitchens

Tainting Liberation: The Perils of the New French L’Esprit Revisit the Fall of the Bastille and Bonaparte’s Legacy

France is on its way to reliving the disastrous revolutions of 1789, 1830, 1848 and 1871 during the Paris Commune. One form of tyranny — be it the Ancien Regime, Committee of Public Safety, the Directory or Bonapartist Empires, and finally the Marxist Communards following Napoleon III’s crushing defeat before Bismarck’s unified German Empire — has an unholy knack of leading to another, far more totalitarian one, immediately thereafter. Today, the tyrants will be the Malthusian Neo-Marxists in Brussels; tomorrow, a new form of far right-wing anarchist vision of utopia may spread throughout the whole of Europe seeking another Nationalist Utopia, once again in Napoleon’s image, all its own.

Virtue Over Vice: Turnbull, Franklin and the Glorious Restoration of America’s Soul

For the Christian as with the atheist — whose church lies in the study of science — all individuals must establish their thesis “from the same first principles, and be carried on in the same method of investigation, induction, and reasoning; since both are enquiries into facts or real constitutions.” Be it the humanities or the physical realm, it is firmly understood that “natural philosophy is… an enquiry… into the general laws, according to which its appearances are produced; and into the beauty, order, and good which these general laws produce.” Thus, facts, as Margaret Thatcher once noted, are innately conservative because ultimately conserve the laws of nature.

Benjamin Franklin justified ‘learning new things’ by asserting to know nothing like Socrates, but he failed to accept he can do all things through Christ, who gives each individual strength (Philippians 4:13). His secular quest for moral perfection coupled with his failure to accept Christ as his Lord and Savior therefore resulted in his inability to break his new habits that “would keep me firm in my endeavours,” while “producing affluence and independence, would make more easy the practice of Sincerity and Justice” as a man of free will choosing to perfect himself through the teachings of Jesus Christ. By ‘guarding against one fault,’ Franklin “was often surprised by another,” thus concluding that “it was our interest to be completely virtuous, was not sufficient to prevent our slipping.” For children who come to learn how to perfect (or improve) one’s self by following Christ’s example, they will find, as did Trumbull and Franklin, life is a process to be lived, not an end to be met.

What is the Individual, and Why Should We Care?

Perhaps the key to explaining who I am or who you are is to define ‘What is the Individual?’ The online Business Dictionary will define him using the most generic, two word term as the first explanation: ‘A person’. That person is effectively a soulless cog in the machine of a cold, steely world, void of warmth and possessing untapped potential. This leads to the second explanation, that an individual is “A distinct, indivisible entity, often one among many others of a similar kind” — a majority of one who possess a vote, a distinct, unique intellect with certain talents with a more undetermined potential energy as a free agent and consumer in a much broader economic strata.

Suppressing Tommy Robinson Will Justify a Successful Gunpowder Plot and a European Reformation

For the entire Left, the truth really is stranger than fiction: society must simply ignore the indefensible, attribute it to “microaggressions,” or “workplace violence” and “white privilege”, and move on. The truth, they say, could unlock the American people’s natural curiosity, to freely speak and address unfettered truths which creeping socialism gradually eroded, or attempt to censor all free access to information. No wonder then more and more Americans now spurn the mainstream media in favor of alternative sources. This is the true arsenal for democracy, the ultimate weapon for defending British customs and justice for Tommy Robinson and all who have been victimized by the rapid influx of Muslim ‘migrants’. While some may condemn Robinson’s ‘reckless behavior’ or even ‘stupidity’, his very public arrest has acquired him far more power than the political establishment could possibly imagine and henceforth, a corrupt government openly embracing its role as a police state, teetering on edge ever closer to total collapse beneath the weight of its own corruption, has never deserved for a gunpowder plot to succeed so badly as today as memories of the 1649 beheading of Charles I, condemned for declaring war against his royal subjects, become more relevant.

The Difference Between Communism and the Hitler Faith is Very Slight

Because of this slight difference between rebellious nature to destroy Christian morality under ‘the Hitler faith’ (the Jewish Jesus Christ), and the amoral, godless dogma driving the utilitarian nature of Communism, the matter that mass murder and state terrorism was not a matter for debate. The reason, the largely irrelevant position over who should die between the racially unfit or those classes (bourgeoisie) failing to justify their existence was, not if or why, given they were one-and-the-same demographics. Because of this, the difference between history’s two most genocidal ideologies, in the words of Joseph Goebbels, are slight.

A Full Point-by-Point Analysis of the Iran Nuclear Deal

The Iran Deal was almost certainly designed by Moscow and Tehran to extort the U.S. and NATO allies under threat of world war while empowering the member nations of BRICS (Russia, China, Brazil, India and South Africa) to facilitate both its expansion into Central Asia as well as Iran’s potential membership, which by proxy would include its chain of vassal states (Syria, Lebanon and Yemen).

Deconstructing Political Correctness 101, Part One: A Brief History of What Makes Us

As Joseph Stalin once noted, “Education is a weapon whose effects depend on who holds it in his hands and at whom it is aimed.” The politically correct end likewise for Democrats and the globalist elites is to reconstruct a brave new world where “all will believe themselves happy, because the government will tell them that they are so,” be it through “war without bloodshed” or “politics with bloodshed”.  Other prominent leftists like Russell and Margaret Sanger rejected traditional Judeo-Christian checks on human sexuality stunting the spread of scientism and secular humanism that reinforce Aryan supremacy as with National Socialism, or though those who otherwise fell under the Marxist-Leninist umbrella of “Scientific racism… an equal opportunity discriminator.” After all, anyone alive with a “defective gene pool” or resistant to ‘correct political views’ can fall prey to those profiting off ‘blood money’. After all, Planned Parenthood —  as “self-consciously organized” by its founder, Sanger — was designed “in part, to promote and enforce White Supremacy” by packaging feminism as the great liberator for women oppressed by all “Marriage laws… a continuous sexual slavery and a compulsory motherhood… dictated and dominated by the Church always and ever upon the unquestionable grounds of the wisdom of the Bible”. Such a ‘somewhat unpleasant’ slippery slope acknowledged by Russell would never apply to racial and political “thoroughbreds” like Hitler, Russell and Sanger tabbed to preside over a “Population Congress” under the United Nations — for they, as “Really high minded people are indifferent to happiness, especially other people’s.” Targeted specifically would be ‘True Christianity’ — what Jean-Jacques Rousseau defined to be the Christianity of the Gospels — and Judaism, in light of the return of the Jews to the Holy Land of Israel. And the scientists perfecting ‘technique’ to attack both, according to Russell, “will be rigidly confined to the governing class.” Without such secrecy reinforcing this massive foundation of ignorance necessary for driving the left-wing globalist elite, how else could billions be brainwashed “produce the sort of character and the sort of beliefs that the authorities consider desirable”? It is here where history, coupled with resurrecting the organic and true nature behind the development of Anglo-American semantics through lexicology that could launch a third Great Awakening of the nation’s Judeo-Christian principles in today’s godless postmodern America.